henchminion ([info]henchminion) wrote,
@ 2008-12-18 19:45:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:medievalist wank, wtf

Mercenaries and Paid Men: Scholarship FTW, Publisher FAIL
I’m currently reading Mercenaries and Paid Men: The Mercenary Identity in the Middle Ages, a brand new collection of articles edited by John France. It’s awesome: I can’t put it down.

There’s one nifty bite-sized article after another. Kelly DeVries writes about the problem of defining medieval mercenaries and distinguishing them from other paid soldiers. David Crouch looks at why the emerging knightly ethos of the late twelfth century made William Marshal try to distance himself from the mercenary captains who were his allies. Muslim and Armenian engineers working for the Crusaders receive attention in an article by Nicolas Prouteau. David Bacharach compares urban militias in England and Germany, while Adrian Bell attempts to determine whether the career of Chaucer’s knight was more consistent with a mercenary or an ordinary crusader. Other articles discuss regions as disparate as Ireland, Lithuania, Hungary, Sicily and Spain.

The only thing about the book that really irritates me is the fact that it was published by Brill. This means that it would cost $145 US (about $175 CDN) to buy my own legal copy. In this respect, the entire work shows a sad failure of imagination on the part of its publishers and editor.

I have to admit, the book is a prime example of all that baffles me about academic publishing. I’ve learned from reading Making Light that publishers usually have rational, if counterintuitive, reasons for the way they operate, but I simply do not understand the business model employed by a house like Brill. How can they possibly be maximizing their profit by pricing books out of the range of everyone but major research libraries? Even professors with respectable salaries cringe at their prices.

I would understand the cost if the book was a dry work on an esoteric topic and only of interest to a small, specialized field. I’m all in favour of dull books about obscure subjects making it into print, even if their print runs are minuscule. My dissertation would be impossible if it weren’t for about a hundred such books. I also understand that they have to be expensive in order for the publisher to recoup the production costs. Small print runs, library-grade binding and the peer review process all cost money.

But Mercenaries and Paid Men is not a dull book. It’s about medieval fricking mercenaries, for Pete’s sake. There’s a market for that stuff, and it goes far beyond the “scholars, postgraduates and undergraduates” suggested on the Brill website. Have the publishers not heard of gamers, reenactors, western martial artists, armchair generals and precocious thirteen year olds? I know a lot of people outside of academia who are eager to graduate from their Osprey books to something meatier. Is it really more profitable to slap a monochromatic cover on the book and price it in such a way that no bricks-and-mortar bookstore will touch it?

And what was John France thinking? In an age when academics are increasingly called upon to justify their existence, sending a book to a publisher who will charge $175 for it is like putting the manuscript in a locked filing cabinet in a basement lavatory with a sign on the door that says Beware of the leopard, as far as the taxpaying public is concerned. Instead of subscribing to the elitist attitude of William Marshall, could Dr. France not have been a little more ...mercenary?




(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]tenthmedieval.wordpress.com
2008-12-19 10:22 am UTC (link)
I agree with you about the logic, but Brill do seem to have a working business model, however exclusionist it is. At that price, it's worth publishing a book that only research libraries and a very few rich mad enthusiasts will buy, and you can be sure that they will buy it so the uncertainties of the market are somewhat reduced. Speaking as someone who works next to people who've contributed to Brill books, they don't even give the contributors copies (though I guess they do the editor), but contributors do get a twenty per cent discount, and my experience has therefore been that people get contributors to buy their copies for them, so more may shift than you think by this stealthy discount route. All the same, I feel your outrage. There's several things in this, and many other Brill books too, I'd like to own and never will.

As for Dr France's choice, that my be down simply to which publishers bit. Inside the discipline, possibly because there is an amateur public interested in it, my impression is that military history is regarded as somewhat second-rate. Academic publishers seem not to deal with it unless they can find a social spin that this book hasn't strained to acquire. I agree that this is silly but I think they fear being cited in Warhammer manuals or something. Ashgate or Boydell would just rake in the extra sales but Brill seem to fear dilution of their brand. And as the previous paragraph makes clear, we all agree that they have a brand: if something comes out in Brill we know firstly that we can't afford it and secondly that we need to read it, dammit...

One thing I wanted to ask: you say it's a Festschrift, but I can't see from the website whom it's a Festschrift for?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]henchminion
2008-12-19 05:54 pm UTC (link)
Oops, wrong word. I should have said "conference proceedings," since the conference which inspired it wasn't held in honour of anyone in particular (unless you count the victims of the London bombings, which occurred on the same day in 2005).

I think the book would still be ridiculously expensive at a 20% discount. It's a shame that this attitude towards military history still exists. To my mind, being a professor is about disseminating knowledge and teaching people, not about hoarding one's ideas. I think many professors would be amazed how much information has been uncovered and pieced together by amateur communities with online forums and an open source ethic. In the world of western martial arts, some academics are risking complete irrelevance by publishing nonsense that the WMA community exploded years ago. And if the Warhammer players get their hands on the stuff, well that's a form of teaching too.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]yaksman
2008-12-19 06:19 pm UTC (link)
I wonder if Warhammer and other strategy gamers might not have something to contribute about the major battles in the same way that WMA has helped with individual techniques. Their rules systems create artificial limitations, but they do think a lot about how what they are doing relates to "real world" battles.

Just thinking out loud here.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]tenthmedieval.wordpress.com
2008-12-21 02:57 pm UTC (link)
Well, although I think there is this disparagement of amateurs which is wrong for all the reasons we've mentioned, I do know of one professor working on medieval warfare whose first ever publications were in wargaming journals, on how to correctly arm and arrange your early medieval armies and so on. So some people are aware of the possibilities, but on the other hand said professor doesn't like this fact advertised because it makes them look silly to their colleagues.

My own early messings with wargames as historical tools (`counterfactual history' :-) ) were on a quite different period but I concluded that really, it was methodologically unsound. If your system returns the historical result, it's not telling you anything except that you knew what should happen; and if your system returns other results, you can never know whether it's realistic enough. Basically the whole thing functions as a thought exercise to establish determinist causation. Which is not to say that it isn't fun, but I don't think we can really do much history with it, except perhaps to realise properly how complicated medieval logistics must have been. But what wargaming systems are there that cover provisioning and foraging? I ask because I don't know, but it seems to be that those will almost always be far more important than a combat system as historical factors of explanation.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

The History of William Marshal
[info]zornhau
2008-12-19 10:37 am UTC (link)
Same problem. The Greatest Knight Ever. Only translation takes 30 years to produce, and is something like £50 for each of 2 volumes, available from the Anglo-Norman Text Society, the which I challenge you to find online.

Is it me, though, or are the new generation of academics more Osprey friendly? E.g. Paddy Griffiths.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: The History of William Marshal
[info]henchminion
2008-12-19 06:06 pm UTC (link)
I think the HWM is up to three volumes now and, yeah, no cheap second hand copies kicking around the usual online places. :-O

There are definitely some Osprey friendly academics out there, even some fairly old and established ones. Many of the Osprey books are written by names that are well respected in the field.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]yaksman
2008-12-19 01:20 pm UTC (link)
You're fully aware of the irony implicit in complaining about the price of a book on mercenaries, right?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]henchminion
2008-12-19 06:07 pm UTC (link)
If the authors were actually making money on it, I'd be less inclined to complain.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]yaksman
2008-12-19 06:16 pm UTC (link)
So in this case the mercs are the publishers?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]henchminion
2008-12-19 06:44 pm UTC (link)
Well, as one of the articles in the book pointed out, mercenaries can be a little hard to define. These publishers are mercenary in the sense that they're getting paid--though I still think they'd be making more money by making the book available to a wider audience. However, another element of the traditional definition of a mercenary is someone who will work for foreigners. These guys stick to their own kind and don't want to mix with the uncivilized hordes of martial artists and gamers. So basically I'm annoyed that they're not mercenary enough.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…